LINE

    Text:AAAPrint
    Voices

    Study on gene-editing tool sparks debate

    1
    2016-08-03 09:58:58China Daily Feng Shuang ECNS App Download

    Editor's Note: Han Chunyu, an associate professor of biology at Hebei University of Science & Technology, impressed researchers across the globe this May with his paper on NgAgo, a new-generation gene-editing tool. Yet several overseas scientists say they have not been able to repeat the experiment and have asked him to publish the original data. Following are the views of two scholars on the issue:

    Too early to jump to any conclusion

    When a scientist observes a phenomenon or successfully completes an experiment, his/her conclusion will not be accepted until other researchers can also observe it or repeat the experiment under similar conditions.

    That's the problem Han faces: No other researcher has been able to repeat his experiment yet. So his conclusion that NgAgo is a better gene-editing tool is still not considered reliable. Worse, many laboratories cannot detect the endonuclease enzyme activity of NgAgo, which is a prerequisite for Han's experiment.

    There could be several reasons for that. For example, some labs may have repeated his experiment but are yet to publish the fact. Or, Han might have not revealed a detail (or details) that is key to the experiment in order to protect his intellectual property rights.

    Actually, those asking him to publish the original data are not challenging his achievement. Gaetan Burgio, a senior researcher from Australian National University, recently wrote a blog on his Twitter account: "I think rather than to chase high impact publications and be secretive, we should be more open and share our results to avoid everyone wasting their time on results that are irreproducible and pointless. In my opinion this is the way science should work."

    There are several examples of serious flaws with researchers' important data. Haruko Obokata, a researcher from Japan, claimed to have found Stimulus-Triggered Acquisition of Pluripotency cells that are similar to stem cells in January 2014, yet her "discovery" could not be repeated and was declared false three months later. She lost her position and her research supervisor committed suicide.

    Han initially responded by giving some details about his experiment and said he is confident others will be able to repeat it in the future. Now, we need to wait-time will prove whether Han kept something secret or whether he conducted the experiment under special conditions that others do not know. It is too early to jump to any conclusion.

    Zhang Tiankan is deputy editor-in-chief of Encyclopedia magazine and a former researcher in medical science.

      

    Related news

    MorePhoto

    Most popular in 24h

    MoreTop news

    MoreVideo

    News
    Politics
    Business
    Society
    Culture
    Military
    Sci-tech
    Entertainment
    Sports
    Odd
    Features
    Biz
    Economy
    Travel
    Travel News
    Travel Types
    Events
    Food
    Hotel
    Bar & Club
    Architecture
    Gallery
    Photo
    CNS Photo
    Video
    Video
    Learning Chinese
    Learn About China
    Social Chinese
    Business Chinese
    Buzz Words
    Bilingual
    Resources
    ECNS Wire
    Special Coverage
    Infographics
    Voices
    LINE
    Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
    Copyright ?1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
    Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 四川省| 高雄市| 开平市| 柳河县| 娄烦县| 鄄城县| 岢岚县| 阜宁县| 湖北省| 鄢陵县| 霍城县| 玛曲县| 米脂县| 南郑县| 平武县| 罗田县| 广昌县| 昌图县| 股票| 册亨县| 合川市| 漳平市| 盐池县| 焦作市| 正安县| 冷水江市| 平邑县| 彰化市| 安泽县| 丹巴县| 辽宁省| 惠来县| 石泉县| 区。| 宁国市| 余江县| 乐业县| 南雄市| 蒙阴县| 井冈山市| 崇仁县|