LINE

    Text:AAAPrint
    Voices

    Moral confusion cause of new wave of terrorism

    1
    2015-11-17 08:27chinadaily.com.cn Editor: Wang Fan

    Brace yourselves. There is a new wave of terrorism, as the Friday night tragedy in Paris, coming to some G20 countries. It will have many roots, but a principal one, regardless of the ideological cause, will be the cynicism of the great powers toward the civil war in Syria. [Special coverage]

    A secondary source will be the impunity with which the Islamic State is now operating.

    And a third source will be the moral confusion in the West about the role of the state in upholding a defensible view of what constitutes right and wrong.

    In summary, extremists of all persuasions with a bent to violence will come at us in a new wave because some governments collectively have lost their moral compass and their enemies sense it.

    Terrorists are for the most part not morally sophisticated, but they all see themselves as driven by a simplified concept of morality. The wave of terrorism we saw in the United States and Europe in the 1960s and 1970s was indeed a wave. While each group had its separate national or internationalist inspiration and motivation, they were all emboldened by each other's successes. Their appeal was bolstered by a shared belief that the international system was not only highly corrupt and immoral but highly vulnerable and possibly impotent.

    One symbol among many of the unifying moral outrage of diverse terrorist groups decades ago was the U.S. bombing of North Vietnam (Operation Rolling Thunder that lasted for three years from 1965 to 1968) and then in 1970 the bombing of Cambodia. The use of defoliants like Agent Orange in Vietnam also contributed to the image among extremists that people were indeed living in Apocalypse Now.

    Recently, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon (and Red Cross President Peter Maurer) said: "In the face of blatant inhumanity, the world has responded with disturbing paralysis." Their statement has a range of meanings and demands response at many levels. But on one level, it should be taken as a warning sign. People have again entered the moral landscape of the mid-1960s in terms of the perceived moral paralysis of most governments in power.

    This situation will foster a new wave of terrorism akin to what people saw four to five decades ago.

    Of course, we need to bear in mind that terrorism has not been quiescent between 1975 and 2015. In fact, we have been mobilized around a war on terror since Sept 11, 2001. Yet the empirical evidence is that the terrorists are winning. Many enjoy impunity for their actions, especially Boko Haram. And the West has too often resorted to bombing as a solution, or supported rotten regimes.

    After all the ordnance that has been dropped by the U.S., its allies and by Russia after Afghanistan (1979-1988) and Grozny in Chechnya, Russia, (1999) — the hapless Muslim countries — and the persistent violence in Palestine on a lower scale, the terrorists are still winning more than ever before. They are certainly more emboldened.

    What is feared is that extremists of all persuasions will begin to believe they have a new license to kill. Arguably, the new wave has already started with widespread "lone wolf" violence in the U.S. and Europe by young people who we don't recognize as terrorists because they are not part of a network or movement.

    Explanations of mass shootings in the U.S. vary between blaming it on gun laws or on mental illness. But the reality may be different. Perhaps it is a new form of decentralized terrorism. To complete the global picture, the last few years have also seen a surge of terrorist actions in China.

    As the new wave terrorism builds, acts of generosity and humanitarianism by many people and their governments will not matter as long as the moral paralysis described by Ban and Maurer remains in place.

    Morality is in the eye of the beholder. There will always be potential terrorists no matter what leading governments of the world do. But our moral confusion, ethical paralysis and seemingly perpetual resort to bombing are all a source of increased danger to us.

    The author, Greg Austin, is a professorial fellow at the EastWest Institute.

    The Globalist

      

    Related news

    MorePhoto

    Most popular in 24h

    MoreTop news

    MoreVideo

    News
    Politics
    Business
    Society
    Culture
    Military
    Sci-tech
    Entertainment
    Sports
    Odd
    Features
    Biz
    Economy
    Travel
    Travel News
    Travel Types
    Events
    Food
    Hotel
    Bar & Club
    Architecture
    Gallery
    Photo
    CNS Photo
    Video
    Video
    Learning Chinese
    Learn About China
    Social Chinese
    Business Chinese
    Buzz Words
    Bilingual
    Resources
    ECNS Wire
    Special Coverage
    Infographics
    Voices
    LINE
    Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
    Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
    Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 县级市| 镇坪县| 确山县| 英吉沙县| 丽水市| 铁岭市| 衡阳县| 金寨县| 确山县| 苍溪县| 佛坪县| 唐海县| 青浦区| 防城港市| 灵川县| 湘阴县| 延津县| 莆田市| 上杭县| 扎赉特旗| 修武县| 二连浩特市| 柳江县| 铁力市| 延吉市| 宁蒗| 北流市| 土默特右旗| 屏边| 平湖市| 临潭县| 双桥区| 东港市| 郸城县| 天峻县| 晋中市| 原阳县| 武隆县| 崇州市| 华宁县| 榆林市|