Text: | Print|

    Experts call for diplomatic solution to mummified Buddha dispute   

    荷蘭專家談肉身坐佛歸屬之爭:最好外交途徑解決

    正在匈牙利展出的肉身坐佛疑為“章公六全祖師”的消息傳出后,專家們發表了意見,認為,如果中國福建村民拿出法律認可的證據,依照“人類遺骨遺骸應歸還原屬國”的原則,中方有望追回佛像。不過,民事官司打起來費錢又耗時,最好由政府出面,通過外交途徑解決。[查看全文]
    2015-03-23 15:35 Ecns.cn Web Editor: Mo Hong'e
    1
    A Chinese Buddha statue with the mummified body of a Buddhist monk inside is on display at the Hungarian Natural History Museum in Budapest, Hungary on March 3, 2015.  (Xinhua/Attila Volgyi)

    A Chinese Buddha statue with the mummified body of a Buddhist monk inside is on display at the Hungarian Natural History Museum in Budapest, Hungary on March 3, 2015. (Xinhua/Attila Volgyi)

    (ECNS) -- Chinese and Dutch experts are calling on their respective governments to resolve an ownership dispute over a 1,000-year-old Buddhist statue containing a mummified Buddha, Xinhua News Agency reported.

    The Buddhist statue, dating from the Song Dynasty (960-1279), may have been stolen from a Chinese ancestral temple in a local village, the report stated, citing China's Fujian administration of cultural heritage. However, Drents Museum in the Netherlands said the statue had been legally bought by an anonymous private collector in 1996, who then loaned it to the museum for research purposes a few years ago.

    Read more: Mummified Buddha shown in Hungarian stolen from China:gov't

    Cultural heritage protection and legal experts from both countries said there were no international conventions on cultural heritage retrieval that would apply to this case, but suggested the Chinese and Dutch governments carry out consultations and seek a diplomatic solution. This would be more pragmatic and convenient than carrying out civil lawsuits, according to Xinhua.

    The statue has been removed from the Mummy World Exhibition at the Hungarian Natural History Museum in Budapest and sent back to the Netherlands at the request of Drents Museum, the Hungarian museum announced on its website last Friday.

    Drents Museum has made no comment, though Xinhua reported an anonymous source from the museum saying that repatriation is possible if credible evidence is provided, under the common principle that historic human remains should be returned to their home. The legal process could be lengthy, however.

    Comments (0)
    Most popular in 24h
      Archived Content
    Media partners:

    Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
    Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 连平县| 万安县| 耒阳市| 临漳县| 晋州市| 崇明县| 宁海县| 延边| 惠州市| 古浪县| 双牌县| 綦江县| 石泉县| 阿克陶县| 宁城县| 海阳市| 宜川县| 奎屯市| 贵州省| 大关县| 兴义市| 长顺县| 郓城县| 县级市| 南部县| 明光市| 甘孜县| 沂南县| 沈阳市| 扎囊县| 偃师市| 古蔺县| 修水县| 尼木县| 武邑县| 嘉禾县| 桑日县| 滦南县| 沁水县| 靖西县| 元氏县|