LINE

    Text:AAAPrint
    Economy

    Wanda, Sunac deal sparks controversy

    1
    2017-07-14 10:23Global Times Editor: Li Yan ECNS App Download

    Dalian Wanda Group's move to offer a sizable loan to Tianjin-based property firm Sunac China Holdings so that it can acquire $9.3 billion worth of Wanda's tourism assets and hotels has sparked widespread controversy in recent days.

    Some analysts questioned whether the move is a form of transforming equity financing into a kind of debt arrangement, while others said that it only reflects Wanda's desire to close the deal and find an exit from its real estate assets.

    Wanda announced on Monday that it will sell 91 percent of its 13 tourism assets as well as 76 hotels to Sunac in a deal worth 63.18 billion yuan ($9.3 billion). But the property conglomerate is lending Sunac 29.6 billion yuan, nearly half of the total amount, to push the deal through, according to a filing by Sunac with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on Tuesday.

    "Wanda shall secure a three-year loan of 29.6 billion yuan through designated banks and advance the borrowings to Sunac," the filing said.

    This appeared to run contrary to what Sunac Chairman Sun Hongbin said in an interview on Monday with financial news portal Caixin: "The funds involved in the deal all came from the company's own capital pool," Sun was quoted as saying.

    This kind of vendor financing is "quite rare" in equity transfers, most of which are generally aimed at clearing the relevant goods and proceeds within a short time, Yan Yuejin, research director at Shanghai-based E-house China R&D Institute, told the Global Times on Thursday.

    "It's as though you are selling your apartment to your neighbor, but are lending the money to him so that he can make the purchase," he explained.

    Some market analysts pointed out that the transaction looks a bit like a kind of deal sometimes practiced in shadow banking, known as "fake equity, real debt," which classifies a loan as equity but requires investees to buy back the "equity" along with a fixed dividend within a specific date.

    In Wanda's case, although Sunac has acquired the ownership, the transferred cultural and tourism assets will still use the Wanda brand, and Wanda is responsible for their construction, operation and management. The company will also receive consulting and management fees from Sunac every year, according to a statement the company sent to the Global Times on Monday.

    "It is hard to rule out the possibility of 'fake equity'," an industry insider who wished to remain anonymous told the Global Times on Thursday.

    Market overreaction?

    But Hui Jianqiang, research director with real estate information provider Beijing Zhongfangyanxie Technology Service, said that the market has overreacted to the news.

    "It's simple - in Wanda's eyes, Sunac is a good buyer based on its acquisition record. It simply does not have sufficient capital," Hui told the Global Times on Thursday.

    Besides, the loan will not register as debt in Wanda's balance sheet, Hui said.

    "The proceeds will add further liquidity to the 100 billion yuan of cash the company had at the end of 2016, and will be used to fund the company's operations and repay its existing debts, which totaled 224 billion yuan at the end of 2016," Kaven Tsang, Moody's vice president and senior credit officer, said in a note sent to the Global Times on Thursday.

    Wanda's eagerness to complete the deal also suggests that it is in a rush to shed its real estate assets, Yan said.

    "Since delisting from the Hong Kong bourse last year, Wanda's financing channels have been limited so it is looking to get listed in the A-share market," Yan said.

    "But IPO applications by property firms have almost halted in the Chinese mainland, so spinning off its property business is vital for Wanda's listing prospects," noted Yan.

    Another factor is that China's property market has slowed down recently amid tightened government control, experts said.

    "As an industry giant, Wanda's decision will have a huge influence on other players' future expansion strategy, and may herald the end of the 'asset-heavy' era," Hui said.

    Hui predicted that a wave of commercial real estate developers will spin off their property assets in the future. "In this way, capital can be recycled."

      

    Related news

    MorePhoto

    Most popular in 24h

    MoreTop news

    MoreVideo

    News
    Politics
    Business
    Society
    Culture
    Military
    Sci-tech
    Entertainment
    Sports
    Odd
    Features
    Biz
    Economy
    Travel
    Travel News
    Travel Types
    Events
    Food
    Hotel
    Bar & Club
    Architecture
    Gallery
    Photo
    CNS Photo
    Video
    Video
    Learning Chinese
    Learn About China
    Social Chinese
    Business Chinese
    Buzz Words
    Bilingual
    Resources
    ECNS Wire
    Special Coverage
    Infographics
    Voices
    LINE
    Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
    Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
    Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 青神县| 宜君县| 五峰| 西安市| 新蔡县| 房山区| 怀化市| 剑河县| 巴林左旗| 濮阳市| 高州市| 文化| 卢龙县| 清丰县| 灌南县| 衡阳县| 武陟县| 盐城市| 丰县| 彩票| 时尚| 南华县| 津市市| 祁门县| 东丽区| 安龙县| 凉城县| 漾濞| 亳州市| 红原县| 通化县| 邵阳市| 彩票| 榆树市| 漯河市| 城口县| 岑巩县| 若羌县| 昌黎县| 连城县| 景德镇市|