LINE

    Text:AAAPrint
    Economy

    Meat industry should introspect before trashing WHO

    1
    2015-11-19 09:53China Daily Editor: Wang Fan
    Two senior people buy pork at a farmer's market in Qingdao, Shandong province. According to media reports, people in Asia consumed 6 billion tons of processed meat in 2014. (Photo/China Daily)

    Two senior people buy pork at a farmer's market in Qingdao, Shandong province. According to media reports, people in Asia consumed 6 billion tons of processed meat in 2014. (Photo/China Daily)

    A recent well-researched report on the risks of eating red meat has upset meat lovers and the meat industry alike.

    On Oct 26, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer released the report, based on hundreds of studies, which said processed meat could increase risk of colon cancer. It even said unprocessed red meat like beef, mutton, steak and lamb shanks could be "possibly carcinogenic".

    The global processed meat industry, whose sales are worth hundreds of billions of dollars each year, was not amused by the WHO report that included their products in the same category as smoking and asbestos.

    The WHO report shook even stock markets. Shares of companies that produce meat fell sharply in China, the US and Italy, to name just a few. And if that was not enough, sales volume of meat products dropped 20 percent in Italy alone in the week following Oct 26.

    Meat industry associations in China, North America and South Korea labeled the WHO report variously-"irrational", "irresponsible", "dramatic", "over-exaggerated", "regrettable". Barnaby Joyce, Australia's agriculture minister, said by putting sausages and cigarettes in the same category, the WHO report had become a farce. Some experts even called it fake science.

    The industry's indignation may seem justified if you consider that only a small fraction (34,000) of the 8.2 million cancer deaths in 2012, the latest year for which WHO data is available, was attributed to diets rich in processed meat.

    Meat consumers' reactions were no less emotional. "Let's enjoy bacon and abolish the WHO," some contested, citing Susan Jones, a bacon-loving 116-year-old US woman, as proof that eating red meat does not necessarily shorten life. Jones stuck a slogan on her kitchen wall: "Bacon makes everything better." Or, such people seemed to say, food is a way to enjoy life.

    I am not a vegetarian but I think aroma and taste are not natural guardians of health. I feel concerned about my friends' children who can't have a meal without ham, bacon or sausages, a lifestyle that could make them prone to obesity, high blood pressure or diabetes at a very early age.

    Meat is now a need in most cultures and sometimes a must in people's diets. According to media reports, people in Asia consumed 6 billion tons of processed meat in 2014 while people in the US alone ate 4.4 billion tons.

    The pursuit of protein in meat has led people to some extreme practices. Various additives are often overused to tickle the taste buds. To improve meat output, some animal husbandry companies overuse or abuse antibiotics to promote animal growth.

    In a 2014 report based on surveys conducted in 114 countries, the WHO said it found antibiotic resistance in all the countries in treating seven most common diseases such as blood infection, diarrhea, pneumonia, urinary tract infection and gonorrhea.

    It called for emergency coordination among all concerned parties and warned that a post-antibiotic era may be nigh, where common diseases will again risk people's lives, just 70 years after the invention of antibiotics.

    Encouragingly, antibiotic alternatives have been developed and used by the animal husbandry industry. In China, more and more ferments and traditional Chinese medicine additives are used in raising animals to ensure good quality meat.

    Sales of organic meat products that are low in fat and made from grass-fed animals have risen in recent years. People in China and elsewhere are shifting from canned, frozen and chilled varieties to fresh meat.

    To my understanding, the WHO report is not an attack on people's rights or food habits. It is a research into the disadvantages of processed meat. It reminds people to be careful about the risks in unrestrained consumption of processed meat.

    The WHO published the report in a well-meaning way. I believe health-conscious people will use it to make informed choices about their food and to form well-balanced daily diets. After all, there are many varieties of food besides red meat that can sate people's appetite for taste.

      

    Related news

    MorePhoto

    Most popular in 24h

    MoreTop news

    MoreVideo

    News
    Politics
    Business
    Society
    Culture
    Military
    Sci-tech
    Entertainment
    Sports
    Odd
    Features
    Biz
    Economy
    Travel
    Travel News
    Travel Types
    Events
    Food
    Hotel
    Bar & Club
    Architecture
    Gallery
    Photo
    CNS Photo
    Video
    Video
    Learning Chinese
    Learn About China
    Social Chinese
    Business Chinese
    Buzz Words
    Bilingual
    Resources
    ECNS Wire
    Special Coverage
    Infographics
    Voices
    LINE
    Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
    Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
    Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 永泰县| 福清市| 巴林左旗| 兴安县| 镇远县| 彭泽县| 舒兰市| 遂平县| 聂拉木县| 托克逊县| 邹城市| 炉霍县| 平塘县| 当涂县| 柘城县| 兴文县| 武胜县| 潮安县| 韶山市| 无为县| 鄂托克前旗| 重庆市| 咸丰县| 巴彦淖尔市| 于都县| 当涂县| 庆城县| 海口市| 栾城县| 鄢陵县| 台中县| 嘉善县| 绿春县| 商都县| 民权县| 孝感市| 长沙县| 麻城市| 黔江区| 高要市| 隆昌县|