Text: | Print|

    Supreme court revokes ruling on Singapore company

    2014-06-12 10:16 Xinhua Web Editor: Qin Dexing
    1

    China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) on Wednesday revoked a first ruling that ordered Singapore's Sino-Environment Technology Group Limited to pay extra registered capital for its China-based subsidiary, Thumb Env-Tech Group.

    A local court in southeast China's Fujian Province, where Thumb is based, earlier granted the subsidiary's request for Sino-Environment to pay 45 million yuan (7.2 million US dollars) as Thumb's additional registered fund. Sino-Environment appealed to the SPC to revoke the previous ruling and turned down the request.

    According to a Wednesday statement from the SPC, Thumb was solely founded in 2000 by Sino-Environment. In 2008, extra registered funding was approved for the subsidiary, and Thumb deemed paying the 45 million yuan an obligation for Sino-Environment as its shareholder.

    The statement cited Sino-Environment as saying that the company's decision-makers went through some changes in 2010, and the new team replaced Thumb's legal representative surnamed Sun with a new member of personnel.

    Attorneys with Sino-Environment argued that the request for the 45 million yuan was maliciously made by Sun and was not the real intention of the subsidiary.

    Meanwhile, lawyers with Thumb noted that the request for its parent company to pay the extra registered fund was legitimate, but Thumb's newly appointed legal representative didn't go through necessary procedures in line with Chinese laws and thus the move should be rendered invalid.

    According to the statement, the court went through investigations and discussions concerning key issues such as whether the request represented Thumb in effect, whether the case should be closed and whether Sino-Environment should fulfil its duty to pay the money.

    The SPC also rejected Thumb's request.

    Shen Sibao, head of Shanghai University's law school, said after attending the trial that Wednesday's case served as a reference as to how to solve internal disputes of a foreign company and how to apply Chinese and Singaporean laws.

    Comments (0)
    Most popular in 24h
      Archived Content
    Media partners:

    Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
    Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 武宣县| 滨州市| 卢龙县| 南靖县| 吉安市| 库尔勒市| 商南县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 五寨县| 黎城县| 花垣县| 得荣县| 泽库县| 布尔津县| 珲春市| 潢川县| 宜章县| 万安县| 嵊泗县| 汾阳市| 仲巴县| 洛隆县| 汉寿县| 庄河市| 萝北县| 沙雅县| 南昌县| 外汇| 神农架林区| 南丰县| 六枝特区| 宝应县| 浏阳市| 林芝县| 兴国县| 花垣县| 兴仁县| 盐山县| 兴安盟| 石台县| 瑞昌市|