LINE

    Text:AAAPrint
    Society

    After panda death, enthusiasts criticize Sino-U.S. project, but experts say it is too early to judge

    1
    2017-04-18 10:04Global Times Editor: Li Yan ECNS App Download
    Global Cause Foundation scientists weigh and measure two panda cubs in Panda Valley in Sichuan Province before their release into the wild. (Photo/Courtesy of Global Cause Foundation)

    Global Cause Foundation scientists weigh and measure two panda cubs in Panda Valley in Sichuan Province before their release into the wild. (Photo/Courtesy of Global Cause Foundation)

    ○ A Sino-U.S. cooperative project to release pandas into the wild has come under scrutiny after a captive-born cub was killed by other animals

    ○ Some panda fans have questioned why the project did not follow reintroduction methods used previously in China which minimize human interactions with the bears prior to release

    ○ Expert say conserving habitats, rather than reintroduction, is of paramount importance to protecting pandas from extinction

    Tyler Robert, a panda enthusiast living near San Francisco, said he is sad and angry about the death of Hesheng, one of the first pair of panda cubs to participate in a joint Sino-U.S. project to introduce captive-born bears into the wild.

    He and many other panda fans blame the project's methods for the bear's death.

    The 3-year-old male cub was killed by "unknown animals" in September 2016, two months after he was released into the wild, the Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding (CRBGPB) in Southwest China's Sichuan Province said in a March 29 statement issued via its Sina Weibo account.

    Robert believes the base would not have revealed the death if he and other panda fans had not protested online - they repeatedly demanded the research base update them about Hesheng and the other cub, Qianqian, after they were released in July last year.

    "We all love and care about pandas and we deserve to be informed if anything happens to the pandas. Keeping us in the dark makes their deaths look suspicious," Robert told the Global Times in an e-mail.

    Robert is not alone in being skeptical about the project's methods, claiming the project will be "meaningless" if the methods are "wrong."

    Doubts

    In 2008, the CRBGPB, known for having the world's largest artificially-bred population of giant pandas, started to build the Dujiangyan Field Research Center for Giant Pandas, also known as Panda Valley, for its re-wilding program.

    In 2014, Panda Valley was opened and the base officially launched its reintroduction program, inviting scientists from the Virginia-based Global Cause Foundation (GCF) to get involved.

    According to GCF's website, the team's "unique approach" builds on the "innovative methods" of Benjamin Kilham, a GCF scientist and bear behavior expert who has pioneered the reintroduction of black bears to the wild.

    Using these methods on pandas has met with controversy, with some questioning GCF scientists' qualifications when it comes to pandas. A panda fanatic from Hong Kong investigated the GCF scientists involved in the project and claimed none of them have prior panda-specific experience.

    In addition, she and other panda fans like Robert were "shocked" to see that there was so much human interaction with the pandas while they were being trained for reintroduction.

    What puzzled them most were pictures released by GCF of workers teaching cubs to find water, climb trees and eat bamboo. "Are they training cubs to be obedient pets or to survive in the wild?" one netizen wondered.

    In a picture the foundation posted on December 15, 2016, a woman wearing blue overalls is seen holding a stalk of bamboo close to a bear's mouth. The image was captioned, "Dr. Callan helps Nida learn the proper way to eat leaves."

    Rama Callan is a GCF researcher at Panda Valley; 16-month-old captive-bred Nida and Xiaochuan are the pair of pandas which are being trained for the project's second round of releases.

    "As far as I know, pandas that are to be released into the wild are usually kept away from all kinds of direct human interaction and the keepers wear 'panda costumes' to go near them. Looking at those photos I knew that these pandas are not going to survive in the wild," Robert said.

    Ritsuku, a Japanese panda fan, also joined the chorus of concern over the Chengdu base and the GCF. "We are very sad about Hesheng's death. We think that he is the victim of their research and this is a tragedy. More explanation is necessary," she told the Global Times.

      

    Related news

    MorePhoto

    Most popular in 24h

    MoreTop news

    MoreVideo

    News
    Politics
    Business
    Society
    Culture
    Military
    Sci-tech
    Entertainment
    Sports
    Odd
    Features
    Biz
    Economy
    Travel
    Travel News
    Travel Types
    Events
    Food
    Hotel
    Bar & Club
    Architecture
    Gallery
    Photo
    CNS Photo
    Video
    Video
    Learning Chinese
    Learn About China
    Social Chinese
    Business Chinese
    Buzz Words
    Bilingual
    Resources
    ECNS Wire
    Special Coverage
    Infographics
    Voices
    LINE
    Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
    Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
    Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 永定县| 普定县| 长乐市| 南木林县| 广丰县| 西宁市| 喜德县| 凌源市| 康定县| 海原县| 泰宁县| 民县| 宁乡县| 开封县| 工布江达县| 巴林右旗| 定远县| 万荣县| 白沙| 蒙山县| 石渠县| 瑞昌市| 莫力| 安徽省| 栾城县| 酒泉市| 汤阴县| 石嘴山市| 呼图壁县| 衡东县| 隆化县| 玉山县| 大新县| 台南市| 阿拉善右旗| 成安县| 太仓市| 修水县| 黎川县| 沁阳市| 连平县|