LINE

    Text:AAAPrint
    Society

    How did Tianjin port explosion happen?

    1
    2015-08-26 10:30China Daily Editor: Si Huan
    Residents that lived near the Tianjin Port blast site were forced to leave their homes because of toxic fumes. (Jia Guorong/For China Daily)

    Residents that lived near the Tianjin Port blast site were forced to leave their homes because of toxic fumes. (Jia Guorong/For China Daily)

    At least 123 people were killed after a massive explosion ripped through a chemical storage facility in Tianjin port earlier this month. Now residents want to know went wrong

    Mystery still surrounds the massive chemical explosion at Tianjin port, which killed at least 123 people earlier this month.

    At the center of the storm is Tianjin Dongjiang Port Rui Hai International Logistics Co, which stored toxic chemicals at the blast site. Residents living close to the storage facility have described it as an "arsenal".

    So, what actually happened? Below, are the key questions being asked about the deadly disaster:

    How did Rui Hai International obtain a permit to store toxic chemicals?

    For many residents, that is the key issue.

    The company at the heart of the police investigation is Rui Hai International, which stored chemicals at the site without, it is claimed, the knowledge of local authorities.

    With registered capital of 100 million yuan ($15.7 million), Rui Hai International was set up in Dongjiang Free Trade Port Zone in 2012. The company's business facilities are made up of warehouses, storage terminals, storage yards, wastewater sumps and office buildings.

    The company's website showed that it received a permit by Tianjin Maritime Safety Administration to operate storage and distribution works for toxic chemicals. These included calcium carbide, sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate for use in domestic and overseas markets.

    Tianjin police has struggled to clearly identify the substances being stored at the blast site because the company's offices were destroyed. Confused documentation has also been a problem.

    In another twist, Xinhua News Agency reported that Rui Hai International had only been granted a license to handle toxic chemicals less than two months ago. This poses the question: Had the company been operating illegally since October 2014 after its temporary license had expired.

    Did the company flout government regulations?

    That is impossible to say at this stage as the investigation continues, although there have been accusations.

    Dong Shexuan, the deputy head of Rui Hai International, who holds 45 percent of the company's shares, is reported to be well connected with officers inside the Tianjin police force and fire service. Although details are sketchy, it has been alleged in The Beijing News that he met with officials of the Tianjin port fire brigade during a safety inspection.

    According to claims from a senior official, who declined to be named, from the Industrial and Commercial Bureau of the Tianjin Binhai New Area, Dong gave fire service officers safety appraisal files, but an independent assessment of the site was not carried out. Dong, who is now in police custody, was unavailable to comment about these allegations.

    What does appear clear is that Dong was given the green light for operating a storage facility close to a residential area. To many local residents, this appeared unusual as similar companies operating in the chemicals sector had been closed down by authorities.

    So far, the police has detained senior managers of Rui Hai International, including Dong, as well as the son of a former police officer in Tianjin, and Yu Xuewei, a former State-owned company executive. Both are shareholders in Rui Hai International.

    "Obtaining a safety risk assessment license should not be that easy," Zhu Liming, deputy head of the planning and land management bureau at Binhai New Area, said.

    "It should involve not only the local fire brigade but also safety experts who have the experience and expertise in this area. They are needed to identify all the potential safety risks and should be part of the evaluation team," Zhu added.

    To illustrate the depth of the disaster, the municipal environmental authority reported that high levels of toxic fumes, including carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, were detected in the air up to 500 meters from the blast.

      

    Related news

    MorePhoto

    Most popular in 24h

    MoreTop news

    MoreVideo

    News
    Politics
    Business
    Society
    Culture
    Military
    Sci-tech
    Entertainment
    Sports
    Odd
    Features
    Biz
    Economy
    Travel
    Travel News
    Travel Types
    Events
    Food
    Hotel
    Bar & Club
    Architecture
    Gallery
    Photo
    CNS Photo
    Video
    Video
    Learning Chinese
    Learn About China
    Social Chinese
    Business Chinese
    Buzz Words
    Bilingual
    Resources
    ECNS Wire
    Special Coverage
    Infographics
    Voices
    LINE
    Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
    Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
    Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 淮南市| 盐亭县| 钟祥市| 呼伦贝尔市| 昭觉县| 会昌县| 浮山县| 新安县| 墨脱县| 洪洞县| 南漳县| 扬中市| 营山县| 辉南县| 永安市| 故城县| 凌云县| 正定县| 宣恩县| 巴东县| 四川省| 保康县| 扎兰屯市| 乌兰浩特市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 铜梁县| 枣庄市| 延庆县| 平果县| 普洱| 武鸣县| 嫩江县| 祁连县| 光泽县| 泰兴市| 花垣县| 元谋县| 平山县| 正宁县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 泉州市|